On Oct 17, 2:10 pm, boomerbubba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The inclusion of copyright notices and logos in not inconsistent with
> personal use.
Well I personally dont NEED them obscuring the image... (it is likely
I have moved the view so they arent obscuring anyway)
The concept of fair use means one may use part of a
> copyrighted work without special permission, but that does not mean
> the publisher does not have an interest in including such notices.
Shrug no one brought up "fair use", but I mentioned
user needs
>
> Besides, how can you be sure that all browser output is within the
> definition of "personal use?" Someone might easily print 100 copies
> or more of anything that a browser can produce.
It is not significant that somebody can do that or render really large
and cut off the logo if they choose to do so,,, and is entirely
independent of why google might choose not to include there
logos when I print them for my personal use, which google specifically
approves of and considers the only legit use... ie they are asuming
the user is doing what they have approved of instead of assuming
the users are breaking the agreement. (you cant stop the ones
who want to put a little effort in and break the agreement)
So the reason I speculated was so to optimize for me a normal user
making legit use, which will be the truth of the matter in a majority
of
cases.( i hope)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
