On Nov 2, 5:34 pm, tunerGeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's poor style/poor technique to repeatedly geocode the same
> addresses over and over. It's simply wasteful of resources,
> regardless of their vastness.
>
I agree. That's why I like that Mike's solution is the most
sophisticated. We don't know the required delay, so we start with some
reasonable value. If we get '620', we increase the delay.
http://econym.org.uk/gmap/example_geomulti.htm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
