Hi Steve -

Google does not provide a direct tile access API. Native apps may use a
WebView with the Static Maps API, however. The Trapster app does this; I'm
not sure about ManGo.

- pamela

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Steveli100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi Pamela,
>
> I saw some apps in the Apple App Store have similar behavior as the
> native iPhone Maps, for example, ManGo. It looks like it has direct
> access to tile. I'm not sure whether somehow it embeds the native
> iPhone Maps or have some agreement with Google so that they can use
> the tile API. Does Google license the tile API to independent
> developers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Oct 14, 7:11 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Matt-
> >
> > This FAQ answers your question:
> http://code.google.com/apis/maps/faq.html#tos_tiles
> >
> > - pamela
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:40 AM, lepah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> >
> > > There are a number of attempts to use google maps in iphone
> > > applications. I've tried this using the current JavaScript API but the
> > > JS interpreter available in the iphone SDK is too slow, the main.js is
> > > just too big, the tiles the JS API loads are too big, plus the
> > > javascript object allocations are limited to 10MB so the map stops
> > > working after a while. (theres a reason why apple doesn't use the JS
> > > API in their native map)
> >
> > > For the above reasons there are a number of open source efforts
> > > underway to implement a native iphone map solution using direct tile
> > > access using google/microsoft/yahoo tiles. For obvious reasons most
> > > people want googles tiles. Does this violate the current TOS/TOU and
> > > if it does will the new TOS/TOU allow this. We developers aren't
> > > looking to violate any terms we just want to create apps that work
> > > well. Accessing the tiles directly allows independent developers to
> > > create an app with nice smooth iphone panning/zooming very similar to
> > > the native iphone map app. I'm pretty sure the Andriod mobile platform
> > > map API is just a wrapper for direct tile access, so if this is the
> > > case I would assume we should be able to use a similar approach on the
> > > apple platform for apps that are free and without subscription.
> >
> > > Pamela you seem to be the only one who answers these types of
> > > questions from a google point of view. Can you please give me your
> > > opinion on this and the roadmap ahead or someone in google I can
> > > contact for more information.
> >
> > > thanks,
> > > Matt
> >
> > > On Oct 10, 5:53 pm, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Yes,  and this reminds me of why some of the GIS industry (I am a
> > >> software engineer for MicroImages ... creators of TNTmips) are
> actually
> > >> inclined to embrace Google Maps. They are a
> > >> great "presentational media" especially for interfacing with the
> average
> > >> joe and it gives
> > >> a prod to the industry to improve our GUI,   TNTmips our main GIS
> > >> software now has the drag
> > >> the map style panning and an overview map built in to the window and I
> > >> blame it on Google,
> > >> These tools are like the irfan view great gadget but  it doesnt
> "really"
> > >> step on the toes of photoshop why would it.
> >
> > >> Simon wrote:
> > >> > Thanks Andrew,
> >
> > >> > There are far easier and more direct ways of providing instruction
> to
> > >> > remote systems than through Google Maps API. The API is
> fantastically
> > >> > useful, primarily as a visualisation and information dissemination
> > >> > tool but not for systems control. We do not intend to enter the
> domain
> > >> > of hard real time systems, and sensors recording pollutant levels or
> > >> > environmental conditions are generally discreet and single function
> in
> > >> > terms of the phenomena they observe.
> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Simon
> >
> > >> > On Oct 11, 12:10 am, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> >> Simon wrote:
> >
> > >> >> Thanks Andrew,
> >
> > >> >>> ...
> > >> >>> The proposed application has nothing to do with the vehicle itself
> --
> > >> >>> it's all about the environment surrounding the vehicle --
> therefore
> > >> >>> the display of this real time environmental data is within theTOU.
> > >> >>> All this data could be collected from a huge network of stationary
> > >> >>> sensors like weather stations but that's not cost-effective.
> >
> > >> >> Well I agree mostly... but only if indeed it doesnt have to do with
> > >> >> controlling the vehicle
> > >> >> ie if you are not controlling the vehicle itself via the google
> maps data
> >
> > >> > .
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to