Thanks a lot Larry, and your examples gives me a lot of
understanding !

Now the point is to get the Latitude / Longitude of 8k and 100k !

How I can get that ? and how much time it may take to get the latitude
and longitude for both the cases ! ??




On Apr 14, 12:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Apr 13, 8:12 pm, Zeeshan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for both of you to comment.
> > But I m really new to this thing, can u please tell me what change in
> > the code can give me the result ?
>
> > Actually, i have a database of banks and their branches, all with
> > addresses and financial details. There are 8k banks and 100k branches.
> > So their financial information keeps changing, therefore, i need to
> > upload the source file each week to keep the database updated.
>
> > I tried to GeoCode at the time the data filled the database, but the
> > process was very slow, and due to google speed limit or daily geocode
> > limit, the process was stopped after 12-15 minutes and only filled
> > about 900 addresses out of 8k. So to geocode 8k and then 100k, is a
> > big problem for me. That is why i decided to GeoCode them when they
> > are requested.
>
> Your page is the perfect example of why you don't want to geocode lots
> of points "on the fly", in particular if they are "known" addresses
> and don't move.
>
> Here is a version of your page to which I added error checking on the
> geocode step:http://www.geocodezip.com/example_geomulti_bad.asp
> the 620 (and sometimes 500) codes are caused by exceeding the
> geocoding "speed limit".  Sometimes you will get 500 errors sometimes
> you won't, I only seem to get them when I am testing locally.  You
> will always get a random set of yourmarkers, butnotall of them,
> unless you add throttling (which will make the page load even slower).
>
> Here is a version of your page where I pre-geocoded the addresses
> (note, one of them the geocoder returned an unknown address error for,
> I changed the address to a format it could 
> resolve):http://www.geocodezip.com/example_geomulti_better.asp
>
> I changed it to be an array of objects, but if you wanted to use the
> same structure as you had, you could just add the latitude and
> longitude as arguments to the showAddress call.
>
> Note two things:
> 1. the page loads faster
> 2. all the points are always there
>
> I think you need to rethink your assumptions. I doubt the 8k banks and
> 100k branches move weekly, maybe a few change; but those could be
> geocoded when they move and manually checked.
>
>   -- Larry
>
>
>
> > On Apr 13, 11:38 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 13, 11:18 am, Zeeshan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi
>
> > > > Please take a look at this page :
>
> > > >http://www.usabanklocations.com/showbank.php?bank=Academy-Bank
>
> > > > You can see the map Code by (View Source)
>
> > > > Please let me know what is wrong in the code and why theMarkersare
> > > >notappearing.
>
> > > 1. You shouldn't geocode know points everytime the page loads.  See
> > > Mike Williams' explaination in his tutorial:
> > > Part 17 Geocoding multiple addresseshttp://econym.org.uk/gmap/geomulti.htm
>
> > > 2. Your immediate problem is that your map is created in your onload
> > > function, after the page has loaded, but your calls to the geocoder
> > > happen inline, before the map is defined, so it is null.  You can't
> > > add themarkersuntil after the map is created (and initialized with
> > > setCenter).
>
> > >   -- Larry
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to