Do you have any examples that would show off ... umm tracing houses and similar low level poly encoding where the existing methods would fail.(it would be impressive too).
On Sep 1, 8:45 am, bratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > > But, with just five decimal places of accuracy, a big loss if zoomed > in. The API does automatic point reduction. "Zoom strings" are a > relic of the past. Encoded strings have to be decoded which adds > overhead. Encoding is useful for reduced transmission time or reduced > URL length for static maps but not much else. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
