On Sep 15, 7:29 am, Paul Kulchenko <paulclin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also switched to using my own calculations for the Mercator > projection and it seems to be almost 5 times faster than gmap's > fromLatLngToPixel(). I didn't expect such a significant difference (on > 1000+ points). Although there may be other factors in play that I > haven't excluded (I haven't tried the simplest possible example just > to benchmark it).
Yep. Virtually all Google maps are Mercator but "fromLatLngToPixel()" has to be able to handle other oddball projections. It also requires a "new GLatLng()" object for every call which just adds overhead. V3 does not even provide a "fromLatLngToPixel()" method. V3 does provide a "fromLatLngToDivPixel()" method but for tile numbers, you must roll your own. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
