On Sep 17, 4:43 pm, Jeffrey Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry, I wasn't being clear about what we need. to give an example: > > 1) user uploads 50 images. they are already geotagged. they have > filenames such as img_2365.jpg which are then used as the URL > 2) we take each image and its geolocation and replace img_2365.jpg > with the address corresponding to its location on the map, which comes > from synchronizing the camera images with a gps track. > > is that more clear?
Not really. Is your image called "img_2365.jpg" or "555-main-street-chicago-il- usa.jpg"? How are you linking the image to its geolocation? Why are you not simply using the geotag data to identify the image? Using an address to identify a location seems really odd, I'm afraid. Addresses do change. Geographic coordinates don't. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
