On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote:

> > anyone else see it ok?
>
> Works in IE6 and FF2
>
> You might want to be consistent about &amp; rather than & in your API
> script call
> <script src="http://maps.google.com/maps?
> file=api&amp;v=2&amp;key=....&sensor=true" ...
>

Consistent ok, even farther than consistent, mimic physics. Value "none",
false, negative, no physical interpretation, we want not only consistent
(internally free from contradictions, that could be lying about everything
making internal sense) congruency, conformity, consequential relative
extarnal physics better than "consistent" which has gotten to be a matter of
sibjective taste. Youi can have a logic system "consistent" and still not
free from paradoxes (gödeltheory), example "if not None.." should be same
test relative "if..."


>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Maps API" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-maps-api%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.


Reply via email to