On Feb 1, 3:26 am, "Thor (Google Employee)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> This change will roll out over the course of the next 24 to 48 hours.
Has Issue 1933 actually been considered? That is, has status 409 been
considered as a possible response or tested with "some client
libraries"? Or are you simply reverting the change and will consider
Issue 1933 in due course?
Synopsis: 200 is a "success" code, which may be acceptable as
indicating the server has received a valid request and is returning a
response; 409 ("Conflict") was suggested as a result code which
indicated a "Yes but" result -- "We could do this but you need to do
something first", that is, wait a little. It was suggested as an
alternative to "403 Forbidden" which indicates that the request should
not be repeated: 409 indicates that it can be resubmitted.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
