On Mar 30, 1:46 pm, Prince Skeleth <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unfortunately, I can't find the reason why they aren't correct.
> Because many markers do work, I think the problem is in the content of
> the infowindow (between the <infowindow> and </infowindow>).
>
> Perhaps you can find out why some of them do not work? I made a xml-
> file with one 'corrupt' marker, so maybe you can find the problem with
> this one.http://inwe.hogent.be/bouwkunde/bruggen/corruptmarker.xml

It's almost certainly the invalid character in this word: geïntegreerd

It would appear that the IE parser requires such characters to be
encoded, even in CDATA. However, &iuml; will almost certainly fail
(try it!) so you may need &amp;iuml; instead -- that encodes the &
character and insulates the parser from having to interpret &iuml;.
But because you have it all in CDATA, you may find that your output
decodes the & character and then puts iuml; after it, instead of
interpreting it all as one entity.

The simplest answer, of course, is to spell the word geintegreerd: is
that wrong?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API V2" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.

Reply via email to