> I was wondering if there is a bug in the Maps v3 API that it doesn't > show icons correctly.
It might not be a bug so much as some clever behaviour. The example KML http://www.searcharoo.net/SearchKml/newyork.kml is actually quite atypical, attempting to use large format photos (350kb worth at 1000x540 pixels) as an Icon. In v2 maps using GGeoXml, it is a limitation that icons are always 32x32 pixels, so you get the shrunk photo. I suspect the v3 KML parser may be smarter than that, and substituting a default blue marker for icons it sees as unreasonable? "Unreasonable" could for example be where the icon is bigger than the map ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
