On Nov 20, 7:31 am, niepere <beds...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my case kmlLayer not render fast, but geoxml3 yes. > I have only markers on my map, not gpolylines or gpolygons. It's > normal?
For simple kml perhaps. geoxml3 renders the markers locally (in the browser), kmlLayers sends the kml to google's servers for processing. -- Larry > > On 20 Nov, 00:11, "geocode...@gmail.com" <geocode...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 19, 2:00 pm, niepere <beds...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > Which are the benefits of using geoxml3 (http://code.google.com/p/ > > > geoxml3/wiki/Usage) ? > > > > For me is more fast, the singol icons on map is loaded more more fast > > > than this solution: > > > var kmlLayer = new google.maps.KmlLayer("http://mysite.kml?data="+ > > > data,{ preserveViewport: true }); > > > kmlLayer.setMap(map); > > > > Is this the vantage? The velocity of kml rendering? > > > The only reason to use geoxml3 is if you need access to the markers, > > gpolygons and gpolylines created by the kml. > > kmlLayer will probably render faster, but you don't get access to the > > objects displayed (e.g. I don't know how you would create a sidebar) > > > -- Larry > > > > Thanks in advange. > > > > Best Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
