Hi Susannah,
Totally agree with you - however this is not how many sites have been
created, since the possibility of assigning a string instead of the
MarkerImage object has been there for a while now.
Hence my proposition for the pixelBounds object.
On Nov 29, 12:25 pm, "Susannah (Google Employee)"
<susann...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> If you create a MarkerImage object instead of using the string, you
> should be able to access the size now.
>
> var markerImage = new google.maps.MarkerImage("http://code.google.com/
> apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/images/beachflag.png");
> var marker = new google.maps.Marker({map: map, position:
> map.getCenter(), icon: markerImage});
> google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'click', function() {
> alert(marker.getIcon().size);
>
> });
>
> Will that work for you?
>
> Thanks,
> Susannah
>
> On Nov 29, 8:09 pm, sgiddings <mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luke,
>
> > Further comment on accessing the size property of the MarkerImage
> > object.
> > This is of use, obviously, only when a MarkerImage object has been
> > created. If a simple string, indicating the image to use, has been
> > provided to the marker, then there is no way to "officially" obtain
> > the size.
> > This is where my enhancement request comes in for officialising the
> > pixelBounds object -
> > -http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2860
>
> > This request will provide the much needed dimensions at all times.
> > Can this be boosted up the "to-do" list ?
>
> > Simon
>
> > On Nov 29, 9:59 am, sgiddings <mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Luke,
>
> > > You state that the issue 2465 relates to accessing the size property
> > > of a MarkerImage object, I think you referenced the wrong issue (at
> > > least when clicking on the link, it does not display this).
>
> > > Simon
>
> > > On Nov 29, 8:11 am, Gary Little <g...@luxcentral.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I noticed a couple of days ago that markers on maps now print w/o
> > > > enabling printing of background. Great news! I'd love to know how this
> > > > was accomplished -- some advanced CSS work I imagine.
>
> > > > Gary
>
> > > > On Nov 28, 9:29 pm, "Luke (Google Employee)" <lu...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hey everyone!
>
> > > > > We've recently pushed out a new version of the API. See the list of
> > > > > changes
> > > > > below:http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/wiki/JavascriptMapsAPIv3Cha...
>
> > > > > 3.3 November 28th, 2010
>
> > > > > Resolved issues:
> > > > > maptypeid_changed no longer fires twice (Issue 2449)
> > > > > The "size" property of a MarkerImage object is now accessible
> > > > > (Issue 2465)
> > > > > Marker shape references the icon rather than the sprite (Issue
> > > > > 2629)
> > > > > Panning the map on marker drag has been improved for smaller maps
> > > > > (Issue 2868)
>
> > > > > Noticeable changes:
> > > > > Maps can now be printed without enabling printing of background
> > > > > images
> > > > > Fixed bug where draggable direction markers were draggable when
> > > > > 'draggable' was set to false
>
> > > > > Please test and provide feedback.
>
> > > > > Thanks
>
> > > > > - Luke
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
