All of those numbers are loose approximations. There is no easy way to figure out how many geotagged photos are in Picasa Web Albums using the API.
Cheers, -Jeff On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Bosko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you please rephrase this sentence: "I wouldn't assume that it's an > upper bound or even accurate within an order of magnitude.". English > is not my native language. > > Anyway, that must be really rough! approximation, according to my > findings. > I scanned 4 quadrants of the Earth: > bbox=0,-90,180,0 ................. 1.315.249 photos > bbox=0,0,180,90 ................. 2.509.190 photos > bbox=-180,-90,0,0 .................. 1.215.214 photos > bbox=-180,0,0,90 ................... 2.625.895 photos > > and the whole earth should have about 7.665.000 geotagged photos. But > if we use the following: > bbox=-180,-90,180,90 ........... we get only 2.484.491 photos. > > Is there anything I'm missing here? > > > > On 14 mar., 00:43, Jeff Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Consider it a very rough approximation of how many possible results may > be > > in the geo-search index. I wouldn't assume that it's an upper bound or > even > > accurate within an order of magnitude. > > > > Cheers, > > -Jeff > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Bosko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We get 2.973.630 photos if we check the "totalResults" attribute with > > > this feed: > > > > >http://picasaweb.google.com/data/feed/api/all?kind=photo&max-results=. > .. > > > > > I'm curious how exactly is this number? > > > > > Cheers, > > > Bosko > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Picasa Web Albums API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Picasa-Data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
