Well I never said there is anything wrong with re-engineering. The difference is between being Smart and Extraordinary.
Smart - Good Reengineer Extraordinary - Good Innovator. Smart being subset of Extraordinary Swanand On 10/19/07, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 19, 12:54 am, "swanand rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Dude.... > > Whats the language in the link on quote... looks like some european > script > > to me..... > > Click the English text link. > > > So Paul guess that the name resolution used by XMPP is similar to Name > > Resolution techniques on Web or some classical Distributed Systems. > > More or less. > > > After all there is no innovation in tech these days nothing original > like > > the RSA phenomenon is coming up, old ideas are just re-engineered and > most > > of the time rebranded. Wat say.... > > Why does everything have to be original? What's wrong with extending > existing standards to incorporate new technologies? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-talk-open" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-talk-open?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
