thanks for the heads up! Is the behavior on the screenshots I posted earlier normal or is this a bug?
On Mar 11, 5:15 pm, VizGuy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a feature request open for hiding the "scaler". We are on it, and > will update once we have something ready. > Same goes for changing the data presented at this area. > > As for controlling the zoom links at the top, it makes sense, but it is less > trivial decision. Anyway - I see the problem and we will look into it. > > Regards, > VizGuy > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:45 PM, googelybear <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I totally agree with Cesium - as soon as you have data points with y- > > value 0 the cumulative graph at the bottom becomes basically useless. > > I made a screenshot of this strange behavior (with 0 values): > >http://www.box.net/shared/915js4dc9z > > > and the same without the 0 values:http://www.box.net/shared/ihkddvresi > > > or is this a bug? > > > On 7 Mrz., 23:56, Cesium <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That 'zoom' graph at the bottom of the plot seems > > > to use a logarithmic y scaling. This *really* distorts the > > > type of data that I display. > > > > Could we have the option of changing the vertical scaling to linear? > > > > Also, just a preemptive comment. That plot at the bottom should be > > > generated using min/max decimation. > > > > Cheers, > > > cesium --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
