Hi Felix, BugChart The notation shown at the "Creating a Table using JavaScript Object Literal Notation" section of the reference has more moving parts than the "setValue" method.. I haven't seen that section before though, thanks for the link..
As always, using a wrapper implies an inherent overhead, however small it might be.. I'm willing to sacrifice a hundred milliseconds or two if it really eases my work. On Jun 25, 7:16 am, Felix Halim <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the API already provides a JavaScript object literal notation to > speedup the performance and avoid too many calls to > "setValue()":http://code.google.com/apis/visualization/documentation/reference.html > > See section: "Example: Creating a Table using JavaScript Object Literal > Notation" > > Although it's not as clean as your wrapper, I'm concerned about the > performance overhead of using the wrapper. > > Felix Halim > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Indha-cadde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > While working on various projects using the API, particularly > > motionchart and the timeline, I made this little library to ease some > > of footwork required to generate these charts.. The library is > > published as a opensource, have a look at it here: > > >http://www.smallmeans.com/data-visualizations/google-api-wrapper/ > > > any thoughts?.. > > cheers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
