Excellent - thanks for clarifying that. Letting it use the same aggregation function approach that the DataTables use for aggregation would be great, as that would offer the most flexibility. I can see myself wanting to represent things such as the variance or even skew of the data sets at some point in the future, so being able to define my own aggregation function is always handy.
Also, the beer is yours to claim! If you're in the NYC area, drop me a line. thanks, On Jun 12, 1:45 pm, Tayeb Karim <[email protected]> wrote: > It is indeed using the average value. Perhaps we can make it an option to > use max(childrens value) or sum(childrens value) instead in a future > release. > On Jun 10, 2011 8:27 AM, "NA" <[email protected]> wrote:> Is it perhaps > using the average value of the 4th column, rather than > > the sum? Can anyone clarify? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious > > here. > > > thanks, > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Visualization API" group.> To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected].> To unsubscribe from this group, > send email to > > [email protected].> For more options, > visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.
