Correction, The federation protocol as published relies on XMPP, but the client server protocol is nonexistant, google themselves do not use xmpp for their webclient.
If and how other programs are allowed to interact with wave is up to the wave server, google server allows it in the case of 'robots'. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:10 PM, RoboPhred <roboph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wave is a xmpp based protocol, and clients are in no way required to > be a web browser. Recall that during the Google I/O wave > presentation, they had a console program interacting with wave (the > "acme wave" example). > It's a good bet programs will be able to access wave. > > On Oct 11, 12:29 pm, ThomasWrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The verse protocol is interesting, but not as suitable as wave for our > > needs. > > Its not just the collaborative realtime aspex that makes wave so > > fantastic, but the idea of having potentialy many different wave > > severs all worldwide, which only exchange waves with eachother where > > neccessery. Compatible, completely public, yet decentralised system > > seems to be ideal. > > We want anyone to be able to make attachments to their (real world) > > locations and share them with anyone. > > Theres plenty of AR phone apps now...Layer...Wikitude...but these > > things relay on "1 to many" style dilivery of content, when we are > > interested in a potential many<>many system which wave feederation is > > closer too. > > > > Plus, as we are just a small group of interested individuals, we dont > > have the muscle to push a new worldwide collection of severs, with a > > new account systems, so its nice to be able to piggy-back on the > > wave. :) > > (of course, the data itself isnt nesscerly hosted on the wave, mostly > > it would just be links..clients would only download data they need > > when they are in or near visual range). > > > > Anyway, I'll follow your advice and post on the protocol discusion > > forum. > > > > I'm also interested if anyone hear knows how Gravity works though. In > > many ways what we are doing is equilivent too. > > > > On 11 okt, 19:25, Joe Developer <joe.d.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:14 PM, twdarkflame <darkfl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > ...if it isnt already? > > > > I'm currently playing with robots, and understand they can only be > run > > > > of appengine at the moment. I hear talk they will in future be able > to > > > > be run from any sever. > > > > Would this include just running localy on a client? > > > > > The concept I'm working on involves waves being used to exchange, > > > > > > store, and collaboratively edit in (near) real time non-text based > > > > data. Therefor it makes little sense for the users to see the normal > > > > google wave client. > > > > The specific scenaro is for the use with Augmented Reality > > > > systems...so in most case's this will be phones or even HMD's > > > > displaying 3d meshs at log/lat co-ordinates. > > > > As we are currently working on a roadmap for this development, it > > > > would be nice to see more clearly how a Wave could be viewed and > > > > updated from a local client software rather then a user/browser > > > > directly. > > > > > You may want to give your input to the Client / Server Protocol > discussion > > > that should be taking place in the google-wave-protocol group. > > > > > The pygowave project is implementing a federation server and a custom > client > > > for it. > > > > > While you presumably could manhandle that data in over googles wave > servers > > > it sounds like you would be looking more at running your own federation > > > server? Also, have you seen 'Verse Protocol' ? It sounds like it caters > to > > > your needs. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
