Right, it should be possible according to the data model, but in developer tests, images are not being rendered as linkable. We are working on resolving the latter.
- pamela On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Christopher Harvey <ckhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > My interpretation of the spec would say 'yes': given that a link is an > annotation and that an image is an element that is part of a blip's line > element, and that the line may be annotated. > In our implementation, we have included the attachment ID within the > annotation data, and thus do not (currently) see the use of an 'independent' > image element... > HTH > Chris > -- > iotawave.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Wave API" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
