On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What was misplaced about this? > The break needs to happen if a plugin was successfully found rather than if an error occurred trying to initialize it. > By the way, we're at a point now where changes to the OOPHM branch need to > be reviewed. > This was to changes/jat/oophm-trunk-r3274, not branches/oophm. I am trying to get Sam's code, which predates the JSNI rewrite, working there before porting it to the new branch. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
