The failure that's occurring is very similar to the problem described in
#864.  The assumptions of the test or the code we are testing is wrong.  I
don't feel comfortable adding a lot of conditional code in the test when we
already know it is broken.

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Kelly Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Have you considered disabling those tests only for the platforms where they
> are flaky?
> /kel
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:26 PM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If we already comment out some methods, then LGTM.  Joel doesn't think it
>> matters, and I just wanted to be consistent not realizing that we've already
>> used both comments and "disabled" methods.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John LaBanca
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't mind doing that.  There are several other methods in ImageTest
>>> commented out in the same way I did it.  Want me to do the same for those?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:13 PM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we usually just rename the test to "disabledTestXXX" so JUnit
>>>> doesn't run it.  Do you mind doing it that way instead, but leaving the
>>>> comment?  Otherwise, the next time somebody auto-formats, the method will 
>>>> be
>>>> formatted like a comment.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> John LaBanca
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello John,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like for you to review this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> The testChangeClippedImageToUnclipped() method fails intermittently in
>>>>> our continuous build system on Linux hosted mode.  This could be related 
>>>>> to
>>>>> issues 863 & 864
>>>>>
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=863
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=864
>>>>>
>>>>> I've commented out the test, as there are many other tests in this
>>>>> TestCase that are commented out due to the same issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> M      user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ImageTest.java
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
>>>>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
>>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you received this communication by mistake, you are entitled to one free
> ice cream cone on me. Simply print out this email including all relevant
> SMTP headers and present them at my desk to claim your creamy treat. We'll
> have a laugh at my emailing incompetence, and play a game of ping pong.
> (offer may not be valid in all States).
>



-- 
Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to