Thank you!
Committed as r1093.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As you've proven your ability (several times now) to produce tight good
> code, I've added you as a gwt-incubator committer, so you should be able to
> commit it yourself
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Good enough to commit it for me? :)
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oops. My *other* datepicker, right.
>>>> Here's the new patch with gen2 datepicker and implementing HasValue on
>>>> DropDownListBox instead of CustomListBox.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Isaac
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I like the feel of it, can you patch against the gen2 datepicker
>>>>> though?  Also, I think we might want to move the HasValue interface from
>>>>> CustomListBox to DropDownListBox, as we plan to eventually have a
>>>>> MultiSelectListBox and therefore, we might want to keep our options open.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I originally proposed a HasValue interface in this 
>>>>>> thread<http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse_thread/thread/b696e7319fc6bea>.
>>>>>> Although the discussion largely focused on data binding, HasValue is not 
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> attempt at a data binding library. The HasValue concept is more about
>>>>>> providing a common API for many Widgets and other Objects that have a
>>>>>> distinct logical value. This is conceptually the same as HasText, but
>>>>>> parameterized to allow for data types other than String.
>>>>>> The attached patch to the Incubator trunk includes the HasValue
>>>>>> interface and implements this interface in DropDownListBox and 
>>>>>> DatePicker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
>>>>> binary, and those who don't"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
>>> binary, and those who don't"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
> binary, and those who don't"
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to