Thanks for keeping us honest, Ray! Alex and I will add a test for this
behavior to DialogBoxTest and reply back on this thread with the code
review.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Shouldn't there be a change to PopupTest to go along with this?
>
> On 10/7/08, Alex Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Rajeev :)
> >
> > Thanks for the quick review!
> >
> > Responses inline.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Rajeev Dayal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> DialogBox.java
> >> 199: Spelling: sceen --> screen
> > OK
> >
> >> 243: @Overrides on an a method that implements an interface only works
> in
> >> Java 1.6. While GWT on the the trunk currently support JDK 1.6, the code
> >> base still compiles under GWT 1.5. If this change goes in, then GWT will
> >> no
> >> longer be able to compile under JDK 1.5. Let's get rid of the
> annotation.
> > OK
> >
> >> 245: Do you need to recompute clientLeft and clientTop on window resize?
> >> Can
> >> these change based on a window resize?
> >
> > I don't think they can change on resize. For example, in RTL mode for
> > IE, clientLeft is the width of a scrollbar.
> >
> >> General:
> >> I did some testing and it looks good. Dragging in IE6 in RTL mode is
> still
> >> somewhat odd with the jumpiness, but workable. I wonder if we could
> >> improve
> >> RTL dragging in general in IE6/IE7. It might be worth filing a bug for.
> If
> >> I
> >> had to suspect something, it might be the use of CSS expressions and a
> >> hidden IFRAME to prevent scrollbar shine-through. This isn't needed in
> >> IE7,
> >> as they've fixed this at the rendering level, so it might be worth
> >> exploring
> >> at least an improvement for IE7 at some point.
> >> After addressing the above nits, feel free to hit the commit switch.
> >
> > Committed r3724, put in issue 2957.
> >
> > --
> > Alex Rudnick
> > swe, gwt, atl
> >
> > > >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to