> I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of > generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData > instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any > work to integrate with the data binding library.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. > Done. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/ There's nothing > there yet, but I'll look into fixing that ASAP. Great, I've added a ticket already. The code would be helpful though :P. We'd like to start sending in patches when we find some things to change. > Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given > that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm > not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given > direction. Oh, working for the enemy :P? Well good luck with your move, hope all goes well. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Ian Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think requiring the HasData interface isn't a bad thing, but this >> might frustrate developers in the short term as standard GWT widgets >> don't implement the HasData interface. > > I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of > generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData > instance so that, given a HasData instance, you don't have to do any > work to integrate with the data binding library. > >> Overall it looks good. I like the new API idea. > > I think that settles it--I like it, too, and I guess your +1 makes me > not insane. > >> P.S. Are you going to create a new Google Code project? It'd be easier >> to track issues and contribute code. Thanks! > > Done. http://code.google.com/p/gwt-data-binding/ There's nothing > there yet, but I'll look into fixing that ASAP. > >> P.P.S. Nice to have a fellow Torontonian here :) > > Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given > that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm > not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given > direction. > > Ian > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
