Yeah, sorry.. we checked it into the 1.6 branch.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Miguel Méndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can we get a patch?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hearing no objections, we implemented this. :)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM, BobV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  Scott, Miguel, Kelly, and I sat down today to try to resolve some of
>>> the problems with the existing "WAR" deployment design.  Here is our
>>> strawman proposal for how it should work in the future (we can go into
>>> more detail on the rationale).  Note that legacy mode would be
>>> supported for 1.6 to maintain backwards compatibility.
>>>
>>> Either:
>>> 1a) A new tag in GWT modules to specify a subdir in the output folder
>>> to deploy into, something like: <deploy-path value="/shortName" />
>>>  - This specifies a subdirectory inside your WAR directory that GWT
>>> should output public files (and compiled files) into.  For backwards
>>> compatibility, the default value if this tag isn't specified will be
>>> the fully-qualified module name.
>>>  - Our project creator could emit a either a module short name, or a
>>> constant name (such as "gwt" or "compiled").
>>>  - A user could also specify "/" to dump the output directly into the
>>> top level of the WAR directory.
>>>   - <deploy-path> tags are inherited and last-one wins.
>>>
>>> or:
>>> 1b) A new attribute "deploy-path" on the <module> tag.
>>>  - As above, except that the value is not inherited.
>>>
>>> 2) GWTShell (or another entry point) requires you to specify the
>>> modules you care about on the command line.  This is critical because
>>> during hosted mode development, we need to create a map of deploy-path
>>> -> module name.  It also breaks potential circular dependencies
>>> between static html files and public resources.  It also gives an easy
>>> answer to "What does Compile/Browse do?" in hosted mode.
>>>
>>> 3) The GWT module <servlet> tag is deprecated; it only works in legacy
>>> mode and is ignored (or generates a warning) in WAR mode.  Instead,
>>> you should configure servlets in your web.xml.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Vawter
>>> Google Web Toolkit Team
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Miguel
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to