Emily,

My requirements are much simpeler, I just need a way to get notified of all
events that happens in GWT.

When I notice no more mouse or keyboard events, I have to popup a modal
dialog that blocks the UI.
Since GWT already effectively has one method that gets called to dispatch
the actual event, it would be nice if I could
just register somewhere a listener that could listen along.

The Preview mechanism uses a stack so that is not an option for me, unless I
make sure that all popup panels use a preview listener that also trigger my
inactivity listener. That can work, but as usual with bigger projects: I am
not the only developer and the others do not always look around much when
adding UI components.

As a consequence when I implement something I need to enforce it in one
place and be done with it.

David


On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> They are related, so it may be possible to unify them, but I have not given
> it enough thought to be sure. I'd love to see a proposal if you have one in
> mind?
>
>           Cheers,
>
>                    Emily
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Ray Cromwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Emily,
>>  Would  my various proposals for a pluggable event propagation
>> mechanism help allow us to address this in a more generalized matter?
>>
>> -Ray
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  > What about deprecating the old DOM.addEventPreview and creating an
>> > DOM.addPreviewHandler instead, where the PreviewEvent extends DomEvent
>> and
>> > has some specialized methods to stop the event from going down the GWT
>> > preview event chain.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Other Solutions:
>> >> > ============
>> >> > We considered passing the event preview down the existing stack of
>> >> > EventPreview, which fixes the problem for more than just PopupPanels.
>> >> > However, we think this approach is overkill because the problem
>> really
>> >> > doesn't manifest itself in other widgets.
>> >>
>> >> What about GlassPanel in the Incubator? Sounds like throwing a
>> >> GlassPanel into the mix would break things since it isn't a subclass
>> >> of PopupPanel and does it's own event previewing.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Contributors -
>> >> >
>> >> > Summary:
>> >> > ========
>> >> > In the current implementation of PopupPanel, a PopupPanel with
>> autoHide
>> >> > enabled will not autoHide if another Widget (such as another
>> PopupPanel)
>> >> > steals the event preview.  In practice, this means that if a
>> PopupPanel
>> >> > is
>> >> > opened on top of an autoHide PopupPanel, the autoHide PopupPanel will
>> no
>> >> > longer autoHide.
>> >> >
>> >> > Consider an example where you have a SuggestBox inside of a
>> PopupPanel
>> >> > that
>> >> > is autoHide.  If you start typing in the SuggestBox, it opens a
>> >> > PopupPanel
>> >> > of suggestions.  You then click outside the original popup and expect
>> it
>> >> > to
>> >> > disappear.  Instead, only the SuggestBox popup disappears.  In this
>> >> > case,
>> >> > the PopupPanels are related, but in some cases they are not.  If you
>> use
>> >> > a
>> >> > sticky PopupPanel (stays open for a while, ex. a debug menu or log)
>> in
>> >> > your
>> >> > app, it may steal preview from an autoHide PopupPanel, and you have
>> to
>> >> > close
>> >> > one to close the other.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Proposed Solution:
>> >> > ==============
>> >> > I propose that we add a static stack of PopupPanels to the PopupPanel
>> >> > class.  As popups are shown and hidden, they are added and removed
>> from
>> >> > the
>> >> > stack.  When a popup recieves an event preview, it passes the event
>> down
>> >> > the
>> >> > stack and lets each PopupPanel preview it UNTIL it reaches a
>> PopupPanel
>> >> > that
>> >> > is modal.  The first modal PopupPanel (which blocks events by
>> >> > definition)
>> >> > will end the event preview chain.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Example:
>> >> > =======
>> >> > Consider the following stack of PopupPanels, where the top panel is
>> the
>> >> > last
>> >> > one that is opened:
>> >> > popup6 (autoHide)
>> >> > popup5
>> >> > popup4 (autoHide)
>> >> > popup3 (autoHide)
>> >> > popup2 (modal)
>> >> > popup1 (autoHide)
>> >> > popup0 (modal)
>> >> >
>> >> > Now lets say you click on popup4:
>> >> > 1. Popup6 previews the event.  AutoHide is enabled, so it will hide.
>> >> > (NOTE:
>> >> > usually, only popup6 gets to preview the event)
>> >> > 2. Popup5 previews the event.  Neither autoHide nor modal is enabled,
>> so
>> >> > ignore it.
>> >> > 3. Popup4 previews the event.  AutoHide is enabled, but the event
>> >> > occured
>> >> > over Popup4, so it is ignored.
>> >> > 4. Popup3 previews the event.  AutoHide is enabled, so it will hide.
>> >> > 5. Popup2 previews the event.  Modal is enabled, so it ends the
>> chain.
>> >> >
>> >> > Popup1 and Popup0 never preview the event, so they both remain open.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Other Solutions:
>> >> > ============
>> >> > We considered passing the event preview down the existing stack of
>> >> > EventPreview, which fixes the problem for more than just PopupPanels.
>> >> > However, we think this approach is overkill because the problem
>> really
>> >> > doesn't manifest itself in other widgets.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > John LaBanca
>> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
>> > binary, and those who don't"
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
> binary, and those who don't"
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to