Daniel,

     You have some good points and what you are describing is almost exactly
the date box we initially had in gwt-incubator.  We ran into a few
significant problems  that made us change to the current design:


   1. DateTimeFormat represents a very sophisticated API,  it was difficult
   for users to replace the formatting/parsing of dates because, to do so they
   needed to understand the internals of the date time format class.
   2. The most desirable default parsing behavior was a hybrid between a
   DateTimeFormat + a fall back to the browser's own parsing algorithms, this
   could not be cleanly modeled using just the DateTimeFormat.
   3. When we used a template method to allow users to override the error
   reporting for date box, we still got a lot of people not finding it, as the
   typical users looked for a setter of some flavor.


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, dflorey <daniel.flo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Seems to be a matter of taste ;-)
> If parse() and format() should be capable of sophisticated error
> handling (like triggering a popup to show the error or whatever) I'd
> prefer to simply implement them as protected methods in DateBox +
> passing DateTimeFormat to cstr instead of Format interface and let
> user customize the behaviour by subclassing DateBox.
> I just wanted to report that it looked strange to me at first sight
> and as I'm totally average this also could confuse others...
>
> On Jan 13, 5:36 pm, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote:
> > DateFormat isn't just a parser, nor even mainly a parser. It lets you
> > customize the display of your datebox in response to bad input. And
> because
> > we pass DateBox in as a parameter, your DateFormat can be a shared
> > flyweight.
> > rjrjr
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:08 AM, dflorey <daniel.flo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm for the first time using the new 1.6 DateBox.Format feature and I
> > > wonder why I have to pass a DateBox to the format() and parse()
> > > methods.
> > > The DateBox is used in the parse method to display parsing errors.
> > > I would prefer to let parse() throw an IllegalArgumentException when
> > > parsing fails and catch this exception in the enclosing parseDate()
> > > method. This would clean up the DateBox.Format interface.
> >
> > > If you agree I can provide a tiny patch...
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Daniel
> >
>


-- 
"There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
binary, and those who don't"

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to