Isaac, I would put money on our updating to a newer version of JDT. I'd
find where Lex committed this upgrade... if there are no code changes, you
might try putting the newer JDT higher on the classpath as a test. If that
works, simple jar surgery should get you where you want to go.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've found an interesting error in GWT 1.5.3:
>
> [ERROR] Line 14: Type mismatch: cannot convert from
> Test.Parametric.Number
> s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers
> [ERROR] Line 17: Type mismatch: cannot convert from
> Test.Parametric.Number
> s to Test.Parametric<T>.Numbers
> Compiling module test.Test
> Computing all possible rebind results for 'test.client.Test'
> Rebinding test.client.Test
> Checking rule <generate-with
> class='com.google.gwt.user.rebind.ui.ImageBun
> dleGenerator'/>
> [ERROR] Unable to find type 'test.client.Test'
> [ERROR] Hint: Previous compiler errors may have made this type
> unava
> ilable
> [ERROR] Hint: Check the inheritance chain from your module; it
> may n
> ot be inheriting a required module or a module may not be adding its source
> path
> entries properly
>
>
> To reproduce:
>
> public class Test implements EntryPoint {
> static class Parametric<T> {
> enum Numbers {
> ONE, TWO;
> }
> }
>
> public void onModuleLoad() {
> switch (Parametric.Numbers.valueOf("ONE")) {
> case ONE: // Line 14
> System.out.println("ONE");
> break;
> case TWO: // Line 17
> System.out.println("ONE");
> break;
> }
> }
> }
>
> Removing the parameter from the type enclosing the enum fixes the problem.
>
> The above *works* in trunk and 1.6, but I searched a little bit and I
> couldn't find anything in the issue tracker that appeared related.
> Upgrading to 1.6/trunk isn't a good option for me at the moment, so
> I'm hoping that someone has seen this before and could help me find
> the change that fixed it. If it's a simple patch, I can apply it to
> 1.5.3 until such time as an upgrade is possible. Moving the enum to a
> non-parameterized type would probably work as well, but I'm loathe to
> do too much redesign on account of a compiler bug that appears to
> already have been fixed.
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
