On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:57 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Lex Spoon <sp...@google.com> wrote: >> >> I left it at DEBUG, only for the following reason: the intention is >> that people can pick this script size out of their continuous builds. >> They'll need to run at level DEBUG to do that, which already generates >> a ton of output. Does anyone run their continuous build at TRACE >> level, even though it generates even more output? If so, I wouldn't >> mind switching it back. > > TRACE is actually lower volume than DEBUG -- DEBUG includes all TRACE output > plus more.
Oh, my mistake! In that case, TRACE sounds better to me, too. I've changed it now, in r5079. -Lex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---