Thanks, John! It's in at r5094 and r5095. Comments inline:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote: > Passing the parameter all the way down this way is ugly, but I don't know of > any better ways to do it. Agreed. > I would prefer the new ArgHandler to be a top-level class, but I see the > others are inlined as well so I am ok with keeping it. Also agreed, so I left it. > I don't see the build.xml changes for test.noserver. Shoot, that part of the patch got lost. I recreated these per our discussion. Lex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
