So the correct solution would be return T[] only for the object array type, and return the correct primitive array for each primitive array type?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Ray Cromwell <cromwell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, My concern is, if you don't make a method that returns a T[], and > instead make a JSO that implements Iterable<T>, you can only do this once. > Java treats T[] differently than Iterable<T> with regard to the for-each > loop. As usual in Java, the primitive types are treated non-orthogonally. > > -Ray > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Ian Petersen <ispet...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> >> wrote: >> > I'm not sure I understand Ray's concern... JSO wouldn't implement >> iterable, >> > so another subclass of JSO would do whatever the author made it do. >> Most of >> > the methods on JsArray<T> and e.g. JsArrayString[1] are final, but we >> > wouldn't have to do that for iterator(), so a subclass could still >> override. >> >> I assumed Ray's concern is based around the fact that only one >> subclass of JSO can implement any given interface so, if JsArray<T> >> implements Iterable<T>, no other subclass of JSO can implement it. Am >> I right? >> >> Ian >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
