Yeah, I think that would probably be clearest. On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds good... Should I split trySimplifyEq as well? > > > On 2009/06/05 19:14:11, scottb wrote: > >> Love what this patch does! >> > > I kind of want to separate simplifyEq and simplifyNeq into separate >> > code paths. > >> I think it would be a little clearer, and would pave the way for more >> equality/inequality optimizations (for example, two different value >> > literals). > > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34831 > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
