Hi Bod and Dan,
Very happy to see that this issue is on its way to be solved :)
Nevertheless, I think it would be useful if JDO management code and
RPC serialization can be separated : instead of having
for (Class iface : interfaces) {
if ("javax.jdo.spi.Detachable".equals(iface.getName())) {
// JDO specific code
}
}
a code like this would be better :
for (Class iface : interfaces) {
if (this.serializationTransformer.isTransformable(iface)) {
serializationTransformer.transform(instanceClass);
}
}
where JDO specific code is encapsulated in a specific code.
As another side benefit, this mechanism could be used to enhance GWT
serialization process for any other persistence library.
HTH
Bruno
On 29 juin, 19:16, b...@google.com wrote:
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9
> File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/WeakMapping.java (right):
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9#newcode31
> Line 31: public static Object get(Object instance, String key) {
> On 2009/06/29 15:34:02, Dan Rice wrote:> I'm not sure what can be said about
> the namespace. What do you have
>
> in mind?
>
> "Note that the key space is module-wide, so some care should be taken to
> choose sufficiently unique identifiers."
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
