Assuming we make parsing attributes using AttributeParsers required (which makes perfect sense to me), I think we'll need to change writer.getAttributeParser(JParam...) to take (JType...) instead. This method only ever uses the types of the parameters, and many consumers of attributes aren't actually parsing attributes for "parameters", but of certain *types*. Does that make sense?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/68805 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
