On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:25 PM, <rj...@google.com> wrote: > John, this seems awfully complicated, and a lot of that complixity is in > support of big public API that as far as I can see is unused. > > Is all of this really necessary for us to tell that 2.0.0-rc < 2.0.0, or > whatever convention it was that we settled on? >
I mentioned that it was over general for what is needed, but Bruce said we should go with that if it is well tested rather than trying to write something else given the time constraints. > I also don't think this should gate release of MS1. > The existing code will fail notice that any later release is an upgrade of MS1, which seems pretty damaging. A user with MS1 could happily continue to use it long after we release the final version. Review responses separately. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
