Will do. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote:
> I just committed to trunk but haven't merged to 2.0. Feel free to roll > mine back and do something better. > > On Wednesday, November 4, 2009, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, Bruce. It's is a bit more complicated than it needs > to be, though (if parent doesn't have a prefix it will never get parsed), > and still doesn't fix the confusing error message. How does the attached > look? > > > > > > rjrjr > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:05 AM, <j...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2009/11/04 03:01:41, bruce wrote: > > > > > > LGTM. I think that to really get this right in general, with better > > error messages, we're going to have to normalize the way we handle > > custom parsers around some shared abstractions. But that's for another > > day... > > Might be able to do something about that today. I've got field references > done, and I'm thinking that before I start hunting escaping bugs that bit 5% > of users I should go stomping NPEs and code gen problems that stomp nearly > everybody. > > > > > > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/91813 > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
