On 2009/11/09 14:49:12, jgw wrote: > On 2009/11/09 14:34:54, t.broyer wrote: > > Sorry to jump in without having been invited but, given > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=805 (among > others), > > shouldn't the iframe shim be extended to all browsers instead? > > > > (Closure-library seems to be doing just this; or actually, it moves the > > responsibility to the developer on a case-by-case basis: > >
http://closure-library.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/closure/goog/docs/class_goog_ui_Dialog.html > > ) > [comments always welcome!] > Issue 805 seems to be primarily about Flash. I haven't had time to look into > this, but I thought you could add a parameter to the Flash object to fix this > (one commenter suggests wmode='transparent', which seems to ring a bell. If this > proves insufficient, I would be happy to revisit the problem. There's also the issue with PDFs and applets: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3268 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=673 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1662 (the last two have been merged with issue 805, and Ray commented on 673 "Marking as a dup of 805, which proposes a solution", the solution being to use the iframe shim in all browsers) Oh, and as a side-note, have a look at my recent comment on issue 2907 if you have time, about the iframe shim and the new popup glass pane: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2907#c4 (the shim should cover the whole window, just like the glass pane, or it won't fully do its work) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/97807 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
