Patch sent for review:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/128802/show

Thanks for pointing out this bug.

Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com


On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:05 AM, John LaBanca <jlaba...@google.com> wrote:

> It looks like this was broken way back in r2661 when we switched from
> $wnd.__captureElement to a static field in DOMImplStandard.  I'm fixing it
> now and testing the code.
>
> Thanks,
> John LaBanca
> jlaba...@google.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:39 PM, John LaBanca <jlaba...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll look into it tomorrow morning.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John LaBanca
>> jlaba...@google.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Joel Webber <j...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like you're right about that.
>>> @jlabanca: Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you refactor this stuff a
>>> while back? Mind having a look to make sure I'm not missing something?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi googlers,
>>>>
>>>> In DOMImplMozilla's initSyntheticMouseUpEvents is a reference to
>>>> $wnd.__captureElem, which is never set (or read) anywhere, making the
>>>> workaround fail as being no-op in practice.
>>>> Shouldn't it be
>>>> @com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplStandard::captureElem instead?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to