John, Do you have any suggestions on how to refine this overall proposal to make it work better with hosted mode? I really like the idea of being able to write type-safe delegate/factory functions that call GWT.create, but Lex brings up an issue of that this may be trickier in hosted mode.
-Ray On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Lex Spoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Ray Cromwell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure how my proposal creates more boilerplate, it adds the >>> ability to specify arbitrary parameters to GWT.create, e.g. >>> >>> GWT.create(A.class, LiteralParam1, LiteralParam2, ...) >>> >> >> Sweet. It looks like everyone is in favor of this part. Unless someone >> speaks to the contrary, it sounds like the lights are green for this one, as >> soon as someone has time to do it. > > My only concern about implementing this now is will that be sufficient, and > if not, would we be better served by waiting for a more complete solution. > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
