Ray, weren't you looking at something like this recently?
Le 15 avril 2010 17:42, Domingos <mrc...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Here I am going to suggest other solution to represent the JVM class
> singleton behaviour. Look at my suggestion below:
>
>
> var $clinit186 = function() {
> // static initialization
> };
>
> SomeClass .prototype.aMethod = function() {
> $clinit186();
> var mth = SomeClass .prototype.aMethod = function(p1, p2) {
>
> };
> mth.apply(this, arguments);
> };
>
>
> var instance = new SomeClass();
> instance.aMethod (1, 2);
>
>
>
>
> This solution seams to be much more light weight than da current
> solution:
>
> var $clinit186 = function() {
> $clinit186 = nullMethod;
> // static initialization
> };
>
> SomeClass.prototype.aMethod = function(p1, p2) {
>
> };
>
>
> var instance = new SomeClass();
> ($clinit186(), instance.aMethod (1, 2));
>
>
> What do you people think about?
>
> Best Regards,
> Domingos
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
