LGTM

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:54 PM, <fabb...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/2#newcode594
>> dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/TypeOracle.java:594:
>> return result;
>> Cool, but is this better than stabilizing allTypes.values itself?
>>
>
> Yes... I thought about making allTypes a TreeSet, but the thing is,
> TypeOracle.allTypes() has almost no callers.  It's just test code, and
> symbol dumping.  Whereas, making it a TreeSet would have a performance
> impact every time you build a TypeOracle, which is the 99% case.
>
>
>>
>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3
>> File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java (left):
>>
>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/685801/diff/1/3#oldcode479
>> dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java:479: }
>> but shouldn't we dump sometimes?  Or is this block full-up buggy, and
>> the real dump is elsewhere?
>
>
> See my in-flight note.
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to