Yeah I'm not a big fan of XForms. I don't have my thought summarized at the moment. Over all it's an outdated, unsupported standard that doesn't have much momentum.
On Nov 15, 1:44 pm, Amir Kashani <amirkash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ted, > > Are you familiar with the XForms specification? I think the original goal > was to get browser vendors to implement it to replace HTML forms, which > doesn't seem to be happening, but it's a very solid in dealing with a lot of > the use cases of form creation pretty gracefully. EMC even has a GWT > implementation of the spec that's meant to be used with one of their > products, though it's not open > source:https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-3100. I think there are other > open-source > JavaScript implementations out there. > > Anyway, it'd might be interesting to have an open-source GWT implementation > available. > > - Amir > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM, TedM <ted.malask...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The current implementation has the following functionality > > > 1. dynamic forms > > 2. dynamic workflow > > 3. submission of form data > > 4. submission of attachments > > 5. client and server validation > > > And UI editor on the way. > > > But the current implementation is a project that I'm the architect > > for. The prototype I put on Google App Engine is a Prototype based on > > a prototype that I used to sell the idea to my company. > > > To open source this, I would like to do it in the following order. > > 1. Schedule a meeting with you Google guys the first or second week of > > December > > 2. Draw up my designs and clean up my prototype. > > 3. Then I'll meet with you guys so I can get my design and vision > > aligned with yours. > > 4. Then I'll build it to your vision > > > What do you think? > > > -- > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
