http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/SimpleBeanEditorDriver.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/3#newcode25
user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/SimpleBeanEditorDriver.java:25: *
{...@link EditorDelegate#subscribe()}.
Add a note that this interface is implemented by generated code, and
that incompatible changes may be made from time to time? I should do the
same to UiBinder

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/3#newcode85
user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/SimpleBeanEditorDriver.java:85: *
JSR 303 Validator. The violations will be converted into
Let's try to get away from the JSR verbiage. Just "probably generated by
a {...@link javax.validation.Validator}."

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/5
File user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/EditorDriverUtils.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/5#newcode26
user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/EditorDriverUtils.java:26:
public class EditorDriverUtils {
How about changing this to abstract class SimpleViolation, rather than
using the nested interface?  Util classes always give me a misc-rash.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/diff/1/5#newcode32
user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/EditorDriverUtils.java:32:
public static class ConstraintViolationIterable implements
And this doesn't need to be a public type. Could have a static method
SimpleViolation#iterableFromConstraintViolations(Iterable<ConstraintViolation<?>>)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1260801/show

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to