[+google-...@googlegroups.com] What dependency? DI is a pattern, not a commitment to a particular framework. That said, I agree that taking AsyncProvider from Gin is a bit presumptuous. I meant to include the gin community on this patch, adding them now.
What do you think, folks? The goal here is to sever the dependency between com.google.gwt.inject.client and GWT RPC. On Mar 12, 2011 10:36 AM, <ara...@gmail.com> wrote: > I support the move of the AsyncCallback! What is the purpose of adding > AsyncProvider to GWT's types? It seems only really useful if using > dependency injection (other usages are usually abuses :) and I don't see > why GWT would want that kind of dependency? > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1387801/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
