Stephen, if you're game to do the research and the work, we're certainly happy to have it done. Thanks either way.
On Wed Aug 24 12:39:51 GMT-700 2011, Stephen Haberman wrote: > > > Hm, perhaps a few. I saw instructions on patching emma; nothing else > > is leaping out at me. > > Okay, there are patch files for json and streamhtmlparser. The latter is > rebased. Leaving anything that is rebased or patched in the jar seems > fine to me, since it's only a few. > > (I'm replying to myself, but I sent my previous message from the > wrong email address, so it is probably moderated/dropped. Here's > the text in case my previous message never shows up:) > > Taking gwt-dev-nodeps further, it looks like most of the deps come from > bundling tomcat and htmlunit. Neither of which I use. I think it would > be fairly easily, at least from a packaging perspective, to make > gwt-dev-nodeps, gwt-tomcat, and gwt-htmlunit jars, none of which have > their dependencies in them, but instead pulled in however projects > otherwise manage transitive dependencies (poms/what have you). > > If I got a gwt-dev-nodeps/gwt-tomcat/gwt-htmlunit build working, would > anyone be interested in that? > > - Stephen > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
