On 1 September 2011 20:52, Stephen Haberman <stephen.haber...@gmail.com>wrote: > > So, in summary, yeah, this is a lot of changes. But a lot of name > mangling is gone and we've been using this in scalagwt with more success > than we had before. > > I'd be glad to answer any questions, comments, concerns about the > approach. Obviously I'd really like to get it to the point of being > acceptable to GWT upstream (either the name cleanup by itself or > eventually with the rest of scalagwt). >
I'd prefer this problem to be addressed in separate CL independent from of our effort. At the time I was looking into this problem I was coming to similar conclusions as Stephen did. They never materialized into clean patches, though. This time it seems like we have a chance to fix it which would be great. -- Grzegorz Kossakowski -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
