Any chance these can get committed?
 
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1876803/
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1762803/
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1833803/
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1785803/
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1736804/

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:02:41 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kurka wrote:

> Repost from gwt-steering:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> a quick status update. In the last week a lot of patches have been 
> contributed and some have already been submitted. 
>
> At the beginning of next week I want to close of for any new patches, so 
> that we can finish the work we are started.
> We are aiming for a code freeze at the 24th of Januar and a release a 
> short time after that.
>
> So once again, if you feel strongly that you need to have something 
> included in GWT 2.5.1 now is the time to act. 
> We also have a couple of open issues that we would like to see in GWT 
> 2.5.1, but might not make it (see: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuK8EZ6jAAQrdDk1ME1lcmtWOWt3MngxOUlTMGJSVEE
> ).
> Feel free to to contribute patches and do code reviews on the issues 
> listed in the document.
>
> -Daniel
>
> On Saturday, January 12, 2013 4:17:29 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 12, 2013 3:40:42 PM UTC+1, Julien Dramaix wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be nice to adapt the following paragraph [1]  to explain the 
>>> procedure for submitting code in gerrit. This paragraph is 
>>> still mentioning svn
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] : 
>>> https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/makinggwtbetter?#submittingpatches
>>>
>>
>> I think the idea was to wait until the move to Git is complete. For now 
>> the Git repo is still a mirror of the SVN repo (git-svn) which is a mirror 
>> of Google's internal Perforce.
>> To complete the move, we'll rewrite the history to remove all big files 
>> (prebuilt plugins and api-checker reference jars) so all contributors will 
>> have to re-sync their Git repo.
>> So in the mean time, SVN and Rietveld is still OK, though "deprecated".
>>
>>>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to