John, I put together a quick proposal for "evaluate-with" as a comment to the document. Please take a look.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:42 PM, John A. Tamplin <j...@jaet.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Goktug Gokdogan <gok...@google.com>wrote: > >> An example use-case would be implementing String.format when the format >> string is a compile-time constant. I had a proof of concept mostly working >> for this, but it was going to require more surgery to the compiler than I >> was willing to do at the time. >> >>> >>> >> I didn't fully understand the example but it sounds like it requires way >> more than today's deferred binding so I'm not sure it is a good use case >> with replace-with/generate-with and static selectors. Perhaps it should be >> better done with something like "evaluate-with" instead. Actually, >> evaluate-with sounds interesting - I'll think about it :) >> > > I thought we were talking about potential improvements to GWT.create, so > it doesn't have to be something that can be done with today's > implementation. Similar motivations were behind some proposals RayC made > years ago as well. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
