SGTM There might be legal implications though. Bhaskar?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In light of https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3780 (see diff between > patchsets 5 and 6, and my comments after I uploaded patchset 6), I think > committers should be granted the "forge author" right. > > That would allow us to fix nits in external contributors' patches without > claiming authorship of the patch, and would provide a better experience for > new contributors rather than having us bug them to fix formatting nits > before we merge their work: the committer could checkout the patch, fix the > nits and upload the new patch maintaining the original authorship > information, before giving his CodeReview+2 and submitting the review. > > What do you think? > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
